دو فصلنامه علمی جامعه شناسی آموزش و پرورش

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (کمی)

نویسندگان

1 گروه روان‌شناسی، موسسه آموزش عالی غیردولتی غیرانتفاعی شاندیز، مشهد، ایران

2 گروه روان‌شناسی، واحد تربت جام، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تربت جام، ایران

3 گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران

10.22034/ijes.2024.2007848.1445

چکیده

هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطه سبک‌های هویت و خودناتوان‌سازی با استفاده از تحلیل همبستگی کانونی انجام شد.
 
روش‌شناسی: طرح پژوهش حاضر از نوع توصیفی- همبستگی بود و از تحلیل همبستگی کانونی برای بررسی روابط میان دو مجموعه از متغیر پیش بین (سبک‌های هویت) و ملاک (ابعاد خودناتوان سازی) استفاده شد. جامعه آماری پژوهش را دانش آموزان دوره متوسطه دوم شهر بجنورد تشکیل می‌دادند. تعداد 210 نفر از این دانش آموزان با روش نمونه گیری تصادفی چندمرحله‌ای انتخاب شدند. گردآوری داده‌ها با پرسشنامه سبک‌های هویت (برزونسکی، 1992) و مقیاس خودناتوان سازی (جونز و رودوالت، 1982) انجام شد. تحلیل داده‌ها با ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و همبستگی کانونی و با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS.27 انجام شد.
 
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که میان سبک‌های هویت و ابعاد خودناتوان‌سازی رابطه معناداری وجود دارد. واریانس مشترک سبک‌های هویت و خودناتوان سازی 28 درصد بود. بیشترین اهمیت در تابع سبک‌های هویت به هویت اطلاعاتی (81/0) و در تابع خودناتوان سازی به خودناتوان سازی ادعایی اختصاص داشت (99/0-).
 
بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: در مجموع به نظر می‌رسد، پردازش اطلاعات مربوط به هویت می‌تواند بر میزان استفاده از راهبردهای خودناتوان سازی تأثیر داشته باشد و نوجوانانی که هویت اطلاعاتی و هنجاری داشته و از تعهد هویت بالایی برخوردارند از رفتارهای خودناتوان ساز کمتر استفاده می کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Canonical Analysis of the Relations between Identity Styles and Self Handicapping in High School Students

نویسندگان [English]

  • Farhad Tanhaye Reshvanloo 1
  • Mohadeseh Rajabi Joghortain 2
  • Hadi Samadieh 3

1 Department of Psychology, Shandiz Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Psychology, Torbat-e Jam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Torbat-e Jam, Iran

3 Department of Psychology, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

چکیده [English]

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between identity styles and self-handicapping by canonical correlation analysis.
 
Methodology: The design of the current research was descriptive-correlational and focal correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationships between two sets of predictor changes (identity styles) and criteria (dimensions of self-impairment). The statistical population of the study was high school students in Bojnourd. By multi-stage random sampling, 210 students were selected. Data collection was done with the identity styles questionnaire (Berzonsky, 1992) and the self-management scale (Jones, and Rhodewalt, 1982). Data analysis was done with Pearson correlation coefficient and focal correlation using SPSS.27 software.
 
Findings: Findings from the analyses indicated a significant relationship between identity styles and self-handicapping dimensions. The common variance of identity styles and self-handicapping was 28%. In the function of identity styles, informational identity was most important (0.81) and in the function of self-handicapping, it was assigned to claim self-handicapping (-0.99).
 
Conclusion: In general, the processing of identity information can impact the use of self-handicapping strategies, and teenagers with an informational and normative identity and a high identity commitment use less self-handicapping behaviors.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Identity Styles
  • Self-Handicapping
  • Canonical Correlation
Abdizarin S, Sajjadian P, Shahdad SH, et al. (2010). Relationship between Identity Style, Identity Commitment and Psychological Well-being in Guidance Girl students in Qom City. The Journal of Toloo-e-behdasht, 9(1): 69-77. (In Persian) [Link]
Akın A. (2012). Self-handicapping Scale: A study of validity and reliability. Education and Science, 37(164): 176-187. [Link]
Barutçu Yıldırım F, Demir A. (2020). Self-handicapping among university students: The role of procrastination, test anxiety, self-esteem, and self-compassion. Psychological reports, 123(3): 825-843. [Link]
Beaumont S L. (2009). Identity Processing and Personal Wisdom: An Information-Oriented Identity Style Predicts Self-Actualization and Self-Transcendence. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 9(2): 95-115. [Link]
Berzonsky M D. (1989). Identity style: conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Adolescent Research, 4(3): 268-282. [Link]
Berzonsky M D. (1992). Identity Style Inventory - Revised Version (ISI-3) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. [Link]
Berzonsky M D, Ferrari J F. (2009). A Diffuse-Avoidant Identity Processing Style: Strategic Avoidance or Self-Confusion?. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 9(2): 145-158. [Link]
Berzonsky M D. & Kinney A. (2019). Identity processing style and depression: The mediational role of experiential avoidance and self-regulation. Identity, 19(2): 83-97. [Link]
Berzonsky M D, Kuk L. (2022). Identity styles and college adaptation: the mediational roles of commitment, self-agency and self-regulation. Identity, 22(4): 310-325. [Link]
Berzonsky M D, Neimeyer G J. (1994). Ego identity status and identity processing orientation: The moderating role of commitment. Journal of Research in Personality, 28(4): 425-435. [Link]
Berzonsky M D, Papini D R. (2022). Cross-lagged associations between cognitive dispositions, identity processing styles, and identity commitments. Self and Identity, 21(8): 963-979. [Link]
Chorba K, Was C A, Isaacson R M. (2012). Individual Differences in Academic Identity and Self-Handicapping in Undergraduate College Students. Individual Differences Research, 10(2): 60-68. [Link]
Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological bulletin, 112(1): 155-159. [Link]
Crocetti E, Rubini M, Berzonsky M D, Meeus W. (2009). Brief report: The identity style inventory–validation in Italian adolescents and college students. Journal of adolescence, 32(2): 425-433. [Link]
Del Mar Ferradás M, Freire C, Rodríguez S, Piñeiro I. (2018). Self-handicapping and self-esteem profiles and their relation to achievement goals. Annales of Psychology, 34(3): 545-554. [Link]
Del Mar Ferradás M, Freire C, Valle A, Núñez J C. (2016). Academic goals and self-handicapping strategies in university students. The Spanish journal of psychology, 19: 1-9. [Link]
Gabriel D. (2017). Overcoming objectification and dehumanization in academia. In D. Gabriel & S. A. Tate (Eds.), Inside the ivory tower: Narratives of women of colour surviving and thriving in British academia (pp. 25-38). London, England: Trentham Books. [Link].
Garson G D. (2015). GLM multivariate, MANOVA & canonical correlation. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates Publishers. [Link]
Gebelt J L, Thompson S K, Miele K A. (2009). Identity Style and Spirituality in a Collegiate Context. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 9(3): 218-232. [Link]
Heidari M, Khodapanahi MK, Dehghani M. (2010). Psychometric examination of self-handicapping scale (SHS). Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences, 7(2): 97- 105. (In Persian) [Link]
Higgins R L, Snyder C R, Berglas S. (2013). Self-handicapping: The paradox that isn’t. Springer Science & Business Media. [Link]
Jones E E, & Rhodewalt F. (1982). The self-handicapping scale. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University. [Link]
Kerpelman J L, Pittman J F, Adler-Baeder F. (2008). Identity as a moderator of intervention-related change: Identity style and adolescents' responses to relationships education. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 8(2): 151-171. [Link]
Khodaie A, Shokri O, Crosity E, Garavand F. (2009). Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Identity Style Inventory (ISI). Advances in Cognitive Sciences, 11(1): 40-48. (In Persian) [Link]
Kimble C E, Hirt E R. (2005). Self-focus, gender, and habitual self-handicapping: Do they make a difference in behavioral self-handicapping? Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 33(1): 43-56. [Link]
Luyckx K, Soenens B, Berzonsky M D, et al. (2007). Information-oriented identity processing, identity consolidation, and well-being: The moderating role of autonomy, self-reflection, and self-rumination. Personality and Individual differences, 43(5): 1099-1111. [Link]
Meyers L S, Gamst G, Guarino A J. (2016). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Sage publications. [Link]
Neter J, Kutner M H, Nachtsheim C J, Wasserman W. (1996). Applied linear statistical moDels (Vol. 4, p. 318). Chicago: Irwin. [Link]
Núñez J C, Freire C, Ferradás M D M, et al. (2023). Perceived parental involvement and student engagement with homework in secondary school: The mediating role of self-handicapping. Current Psychology, 42(6): 4350-4361. [Link]
Pituch K A, Stevens J P. (2016). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Routledge. [Link]
Putwain D W. (2019). An examination of the self-referent executive processing moDel of test anxiety: control, emotional regulation, self-handicapping, and examination performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34: 341-358. [Link]
Robinson D, Suhr J, Buelow M, Beasley C. (2023). Factors related to academic self-handicapping in Black students attending a predominantly White University. Social Psychology of Education, 1-18. [Link]
Skhirtladze N, Javakhishvili N, Schwartz S J, Luyckx K. (2018). Identity styles in the Georgian context and associations with parenting dimensions. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(1): 24-40. [Link]
Skhirtladze N, Javakhishvili N, Schwartz S J, Luyckx K. (2018). Identity styles in the Georgian context and associations with parenting dimensions. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(1): 24-40. [Link]
Šramová B, Bianchi G, Lášticová B, Fichnová K, Hamranová A. (2008). Analyses of socio-cognitive identity styles by Slovak Adolescents. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 2(4): 432-436. [Link]
Stewart M A, De George-Walker L. (2014). Self-handicapping, perfectionism, locus of control and self-efficacy: A path moDel. Personality and Individual Differences, 66: 160-164. [Link]
Stone J. (2002). Battling doubt by avoiding practice: The effects of stereotype threat on self-handicapping in white athletes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12): 1667-1678. [Link]
Tanhaye Reshvanloo F, Keramati R, Seadatee Shamir A. (2012). Optimism and self-esteem in adolescence girls: the role of identity styles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 6 (3): 73-90. [Link]
Taylor S J, Muchnik L, Kumar M, Aral S. (2023). Identity effects in social media. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(1): 27-37. [Link]
West S G, Finch J F, Curran P J. (1995). Structural equation moDels with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies, In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation moDeling: Concepts, issues and ... 56-75), Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1995. [Link]
Whittaker T A, Schumacker R E. (2022). A beginner's guide to structural equation moDeling. Routledge. [Link]
Xing H, Yao M, Zhu W, et al. (2022). The role of perceived parent social comparisons in adolescent academic social comparison, self-efficacy, and self-handicapping: A person-centered approach. Current Psychology, 42: 1-16. [Link]
Zahaj S, Dimitrova R. (2018). The Influence of Identity Styles on Adolescents’ Psychological Problems in Postcommunist Albania. Changing Values and Identities in the Post-Communist World, 281-294. [Link]
Zarei H A, Gibi A. (2018). Prediction of Internet addiction based on emotion seeking and identity styles in students. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 5(3): 53-65. [Link]
Zhuang X, Yang Z, Cordes D. (2020). A technical review of canonical correlation analysis for neuroscience applications. Human Brain Mapping, 41(13): 3807-3833. [Link]